Critical of Thai society began in 2010 by Red-shirts in
the event of burning commercial area in Bangkok
expecially at
Central World Plaza,
led to new government which Phue Thai Party won
the election and Ms.Yingluck Shinawatra was first femal
prime minister but this can not solve the controversies
in
Thailand.
There are many corruption in every projects,the worst
case
is in rice pledge programme with estimated damage of
more than 500 billiant baht to 700 billiant baht.
Critical of Thai political crisis began again in
November 2013,organized
by the People’s Demoncratic
Reform Committee (PDRC),a political pressue group set
by former Democrat Party MP Suthep Thaugsuban
suppoered by large
amount of Thai protesters.
The result led to the removal of the incumbent prime
mininter
Yingluck Shinawatra. A coup seize the power and
establishment of a
military junta led to new cabinet which
General Prayuth Chan-o-cha as a new prime minister.
Gen Prayuth try to reform Thaialnd and reconcile
sociability
in Thaialnd.Reconcilation of Thai social will be on the
alternative of Absolve or Amnetry bill.
Objective of both
absolve and amnestry bill are to rule that
the guilty that happened are no more guilty.
The different between absolve and amnesty
bill
Absolve:
1.The king has an authority to give absolve.
2.The criminal was in jail,the justice was finish.
3.All rights lost from guilty will not give back.
4.There is someone to ask for absolve so that the King
can use his authority.
5.Give some excuse or give all.
Amnestry bill
1.The amnestry bill is an authority of
parliament.
2.The justice is in process,the criminal is not in jail.
3.All guilty are clear ,all rgihts are give back.
4.Need no one to ask for amnestry bill but the
pariliament
can use his authority.
5.Excuse all guilty.
According to the fact that there are four parties who
involved in the guilty and controversies,first
politians,
second government officer, third leader in politicial,
and forth citizens.
What to be think is in three areas.
1.Which is better between absolve and amnestry bill.
2.Who is to be absolved or give amnestry.
3.Which guilties are to be absolved and amnestry.
In my view we should choose to use amnestry bill
because this can do by the parliament another reason
is that the King should not work hard anymore.
Second,who should not receive amnestry are politicians,
upper level of government officer and politicail leaders
because these persons had conflict of interest in their
roll.
We should aim amnestry bill to lover government officer
because these persons did it on their duty not by intention
to receive benefit.And give amnestry to Thai citizens
who
are the protesters because they did it on ideology to
protect
our country from being ruin by large amount of corruption
and malfeasance for holder of Political Position by
Ms.Yingluck and
her cabinet.
Third, the framework of guilty to give amnestry is from
participating in street protest only.
No amnestry should give to person that involve in
corruption process.
Last of all as best wish to all Thai citizens I wish
that
in the future the controversies will be solved and we
can live
together with
peace again.
Welcome Thailand land of smile!!.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น