วันศุกร์ที่ 18 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2558

Democrats fear ban if they join NRSA !!!


 

 
Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva and most Democrats won't serve
 on the new National Reform Steering Assembly for fear they
can't run in the next election. (Post Today graphic)



Many Democrat Party members are unlikely to join the
National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA) out of concerns
 they could be barred from contesting the next election,
Democrat secretary-general Juti Krairiksh says.

Several party members had expressed an interest in working
 on the new reform body, but are now having second thoughts
following reports they may be forced to take a political
 break if they do, he said Thursday.
 

 He was speaking a day after Democrat Party leader Abhisit
Vejjajiva said he would allow party members to apply for
membership of the NRSA.
 

Even though there has not been a regulation passed to require
 NRSA members to take a break from politics, party members
have concerns that a regulation could be introduced in the new
 charter, a source said.
 

The current interim constitution requires that members of the
defunct Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC), take a
two-year break from politics.
 
 Before the defunct National Reform Council (NRC) rejected
the draft charter, some former charter drafters had proposed
that all members of the NRC and the CDC and politically-related organisations installed following the May 22 coup should be
banned from politics for two years after their terms ended.

 However, the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO)
 rejected the proposal. The 200-member NRSA will replace
 the NRC to push national reforms.


Meanwhile, Mr Abhisit criticised Deputy Prime Minister
 Wissanu Krea-ngam for suggesting that a mechanism similar
to the crisis panel mooted for the old draft charter should be
 resurrected for the new charter draft.
 

 The  Democrat leader said the charter contents should be
 left to a new panel to devise, pointing out the crisis panel
 is controversial.
He said any attempts to write it into the charter are likely to
stir up conflict and there is still time for the new writers to
 address this concern.
 
The crisis panel was seen by the interim government as
 necessary to prevent problems during a transition to full
democracy.
 
The body could take over legislative powers if a national
 crisis emerged.

 

News,Politics,Bangkok Post, 18 September 2015.

 

In my viewpoint,all politicians should not appointed to

the NRSA because they have conflict of interest.

 

If they are appointed to the NRSA,they should be banned for

the next election.

 

For the point of crisis panel as it is a controversial point

the NRSA should think twice whether to push it into

the new draft charter or not.

 

Sincerely Yours.






ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น