Construction of the 14-billion-baht Chao
Phraya promenade
faces lengthy delays after efforts to conduct a feasibility
study
tripped at the first hurdle.
Two of the three contractors that had expressed interest in
Two of the three contractors that had expressed interest in
bidding for the
rights to the feasibility study have withdrawn
from the race before it even
started, said Pinit Lertudomtana,
deputy chief of the BMA’s Department of
Public Works.
Mr
Pinit said only one consortium, made up of Panya
Consultants Co, Epsilon Co and
Transconsult Co, had
submitted a formal tender.
The other two — Fusion Consultant Co and a
consortium
consisting of Consultants of Technology Co, Consultant of
Architecture Co and COU Co — will not take part in the bid.
Fusion Consultant Co did not meet the qualifications to
compete in the
bid, while the other consortium failed to
submit a proposal, said Mr Pinit, who
is also a chairman
of the panel responsible for awarding the contract.
As only one tender has been submitted, the
panel will be
forced to propose the cancellation of the bid to
BMA executives.
The law stipulates that more than one
candidate is required
to ensure fair competition.
It will
now be up to the BMA executives to make a decision
on how to proceed with the
project, Mr Pinit said.
The delay follows heavy criticism from
activists and
academics who say the 7km riverside promenade will damage
the
environment, the livelihoods of local communities and the
diversity of the
riverside cultural landscape.
The project, dubbed the “New Landmark of
Thailand”, will
stretch on both sides of the Chao Phraya River, between the
Rama VII and Pin Klao bridges.
The
winner of the BMA contract would have been awarded
120 million baht to conduct
the feasibility study for the
promenade and map out a master plan. Under the
seven-month
contract, the winner would have been required to study the
impact
of the project on the environment, city planning and
local livelihoods, as well
as its effects on the flow of the
country's main river system.
An
environmental impact assessment is required before
approval for the project can
be sought from the Office of
Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.
The
winner would also have been required to craft the
terms of reference for
bidding on the contract to build
the promenade.
Mr
Pinit said if a new round of bidding for the feasibility
study is held, the terms of reference may have to
be tweaked,
particularly the existing provision that says the qualified
bidders
must be companies registered with the Council of
Engineers.
He conceded the provision had faced heavy
criticism for
excluding architectural firms from taking part.
If
BMA executives decide to launch a new request for tender,
the provision may
have to be erased to open the field to
more candidates, Mr Pinit added.
The government called on relevant agencies
to speed up their
work on the controversial project.
Construction was initially scheduled to begin
in January next
year but had already been pushed back to June.
News,General,Bangkok Post, 1November 2015.
My question is why this project should run
if it is not
feasible for any benefit to the country.
Sincerely Yours.