is targeting negligent officials involved in the controversial
rice-pledging scheme, but denied authorities had branded it
"an illegitimate policy". He was referring to the government's
move to claim compensation from former prime minister
Yingluck Shinawatra for the losses caused by the scheme
initiated by her administration.
The
government is using an administrative order to seek
compensation in compliance
with the 1996 Act on Liability
for Wrongful Acts of Officials, rather than
making
a civil claim.
Mr
Wissanu said the government wanted compensation
due to severe acts of negligence committed
during the
scheme in accordance with the National Anti-Corruption
Commission's
investigation, and not because the scheme
was illegal or corrupt.
He said the government will consider whether
the former
premier made critical, careless acts which resulted in losses,
and
that the Finance Ministry-installed fact-finding panel
was looking into the
loss amount.
The
alleged fraud in connection with the scheme will be
considered in a separate
case, he said.
In her recent open letter to Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha,
In her recent open letter to Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha,
Ms Yingluck said
the rice-subsidy programme was a public
policy that was declared to parliament
and the
implementation of the scheme was a compulsory
administrative act.
The scheme legally bound all related
government departments
to undertake its execution and therefore, the claim
process
must be transparent and fair, Ms Yingluck said.
She said Gen Prayut's legal adviser had tried to "misinterpret
the law and
legal mechanism" to claim damages by issuing
the administrative order,
forcing her to pay for damages
and to seize her assets which was not transparent or fair.
Ms Yingluck's lawyer earlier said it was
still unclear whether
the act could be used against a prime minister, who
normally
is in charge of policy, while the administrative order is
mainly
enforced for officials who put a policy into practice.
Mr
Wissanu said the act covers both civil servants and
politicians, and applies to
all state officials, including committee
members of state agencies. It also
stipulates how to deal
with ministers or premiers who commit offences, he
added.
He
said the prime minister did not need to sign the
administrative order himself.
"This is clear from the law,
and not an attempt to protect the prime
minister," he said.
News, Politics,Bangkok Post, 15 October
2015.
I think the idea of using an administrative order to seek
compensation in compliance with the 1996 Act
on
Liability for Wrongful Acts of Officials,has
a good point
that although Ms Yingluk found guilty of corruption
from the court or not ,she can not avoid her
responsibily
in charge of the Prime Minister position that should
accountable for the huge loss from the rice pledge
scheme
that occurred and there should have some authorities
whether at what level responsible for the loss.
Sincerely Yours.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น