Constitution writers say they will release
the draft of the document
on Jan 29 now that they have sorted out most key
elements except
national reform, reconciliation and provisional clauses.
The Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC) has not yet decided
whether the three
potentially contentious issues should be
covered in the charter, spokesman Udom
Rat-amarit said
on Saturday.
Provisional clauses are being closely watched as they would
Provisional clauses are being closely watched as they would
indicate how power
will change hands and how broad a mandate
the current military regime intends
to retain during and after
the transition to an elected government, expected around the
middle of 2017. Mr Udom said that apart from these three issues,
the draft
charter was ready and decisions had been reached on
all key elements.
The text and other details will be reviewed from Jan 11-17, during
The text and other details will be reviewed from Jan 11-17, during
which the
CDC plans a series of meetings to hear opinions on
which elements are being
closely watched and which ones
are opposed.
After the draft is introduced on Jan 29, more opinions will be
After the draft is introduced on Jan 29, more opinions will be
sought, from the
National Reform Steering Assembly among
others, to determine if further
revisions should be made.
Details were not available on other individuals or
groups that
might be consulted.
The biggest test for the charter will come
later this year when it
is put to a public referendum, expected no later than
August.
Mr Udom said the CDC had not discussed the referendum and
declined to
comment further.
The issue of a referendum remains
controversial even though
the 2014 interim charter stipulates one and Prime
Minister
Prayut Chan-o-cha has stressed that it will be held.
This is because Section 37 of the interim
charter says after
the draft is finished, it will be put to a referendum and
must be
endorsed by "the majority of voters", instead of "the
majority of
voters who cast ballots in the referendum" as written in
previous charters.
Lawyers have pointed out that based on the
current wording,
the draft would never pass . There are 49 million voters in
Thailand and if 70% or 34.3 million of them turn out, the draft
will pass only
if a staggering 24.5 million — 72% of those
casting ballots — vote yes, which
is unlikely.
In the 2007 charter referendum, voter
turnout was just under 60%,
and 58.3% of those voting approved the draft.
Concern about
the existing definition of "majority" approval was one
of the
reasons that the former National Reform Council voted down
the previous
draft written by the Borwornsak Uwanno team in
September 2015.
Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam has
dismissed
the concern, saying the clause should be interpreted as
"half of
the voters who come to cast the ballot", even though
the wording gives no
room for such an interpretation.
He said it could easily be fixed in an
amendment if necessary
but to date that has not happened. The interim charter
also
does not say what will happen if the new draft charter is
voted down in
the referendum.
Some speculate that the junta might pick one of the old
constitutions revise it slightly and use it, but this has never
been confirmed.
News,Politics,Bangkok Post,3 January 2016.
In my opinion,the new draft charter should
be referendum.
there may be conflict of interest for politicians.
So it depend on how the CDC and the
government communicate
with the people to understand the new
charter and accept it.
If people reject it ,I believe Gen Prayut
and the government have
a solution for the situation or should stay
long in the power…J
Sincerely Yours.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น