วันอังคารที่ 16 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2559

NRSA plays down strategy bill worries


 

 
The controversial national strategy bill has won a majority in
 the National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA), as proponents
brushed aside worries it grants too much power to a new
 committee overseeing the the 20-year strategy.

 During the NRSA meeting Tuesday in which members voted
 164 to 6 to approve the bill, Pol Maj Yongyut Sarasombat,
 who led a NRSA committee to prepare it, insisted the strategy
 committee will only serve as an "X-ray scanner" looking
 for politicians and authorities who do not comply with
 the strategy.

The committee "has no direct power" to punish anybody as
 it can only ask state agencies to act against people who commit
wrongdoing, he said.

If politicians go against the strategy and cause subsequent
damage, the committee will forward their cases to the Senate,
Pol Maj Yongyut said.

Dishonest authorities will be probed by the National
Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) while state officials
 will face disciplinary action, he added.

According to the bill, the national strategy committee is made
 up of 25 people, including the prime minister, the NRSA
chairman, and the National Legislative Assembly (NLA)
 chairman.

The bill concerns mainly "the mechanics, not the essence,"
of the strategy, he said.

 It will be the responsibility of the panel to draft the first
 strategy, which will last 20 years. The strategy is needed as
 it will deal with unfinished reform plans, suggested by the
 NRSA and others as proposals that will benefit the nation,
 Pol Maj Yongyut said.

 However, some NRSA members questioned whether the
 strategy is really needed and whether the 25-member panel
 will be another version of the so-called "crisis panel",
formally known as the National Committee on Reform and
 Reconciliation Strategy.

The crisis panel, which was earlier proposed by a previous
 constitution drafting committee led by law expert,
Borwornsak Uwanno, was to comprise military and police
 top brass and would be empowered to seize executive and
 legislative power in time of political crisis.


The proposal drew huge opposition as it was viewed as
going against democracy and the draft charter of the
 Borwornsak committee was last year voted down by the
National Reform Council, which was later replaced by
the NRSA.

NRSA member Kasit Piromya said he was worried the
strategy committee may not be different from the crisis panel
 because it seems to have more power than that of an
elected government.


However, another bill proponent and NRSA member Kamnoon
Sidhisamarn argued the committee will act as a state agency
 and it has no legislative, executive and judicial powers.
 More importantly, he said, it is not a crisis panel as it does not
 consist of military and police top brass and it cannot overrule
the government or parliament during a crisis.

The panel headed by Pol Maj Yongyut wants the bill to be
 enacted this year and the Meechai Ruchupan-led Constitutional
Drafting Committee to state the strategy in the draft charter.

 Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha wants the draft charter to
 stipulate that the government must follow the strategy and
 the national economic and social development plan, Deputy
Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam said Tuesday.

In another development, Interior Minister Gen Anupong
Paojinda warned members of the Association of Village and
 Tambon Chiefs of Thailand against a planned gathering
today at the parliament.

The association is upset because the draft does not mention
central and regional administrations in the chapter on local
 administration.
Gen Anupong said the gathering is not appropriate in the
current climate. He said they should make their concerns heard
 through other channels.


News,Politics,Bangkok Post ,17 February 2016.


 

In my viewpoint,as the controversial “National Strategy Bill”

duty is only ask state agencies to act against people who

 commit wrongdoing so it is good to set it.


As the Strategy committee will forward the case of politicains

who against the strategy and cause subsequent damage to

the Senators so the process of appointment senators must

do carefully to make sure that the country get good senators

to behave on their duty.

 

Sincerely Yours.

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น