วันเสาร์ที่ 29 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2558

EC recommends constitution writers shouldn’t lobby voters!!


 
The Election Commission has proposed that the 21 constitution

writers who sit on the National Reform Council (NRC) should

 not be allowed to persuade people to accept the charter draft

in the referendum.


EC chairman Supachai Somcharoen said on Saturday that the
 
 commission had finished drafting the announcement of a
 
referendum, to be submitted to the National Legislative Assembly
 
(NLA) for endorsement .
 

The referendum will be held only after the NRC votes to endorse
 
 the charter. The NRC is scheduled to vote on Sept 6. It has been
 
 speculated that the charter draft would be endorsed.
 
 It remains unclear whether the 21 members of the Constitution
 
Drafting Committee (CDC) will be allowed to vote on their
 
own draft. The CDC has 36 members in total and 21 of them
 
hold seats on the 247-member NRC.
 

Critics have said it would be a conflict of interest to allow the
 
 drafters to vote. Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam
 
said earlier that . there was no law or rule that prevents the
 
 charter writers from voting on the document they had written.
 
 NRC chairman Thienchay Kiranandana agreed, but said that
 
 since the vote would be done openly, the CDC members could
 
be allowed to join and their votes would be deducted later
 
 if problems emerged. Some NRC members believe it would be
 
 unethical for the CDC members to vote. They point out that
 
former MPs and senators in the Yingluck Shinawatra government
 
were almost impeached for the same behaviour.
 
They had been accused of having a conflict of interest when
 
 they voted on a charter amendment that would enable them
 
 to run in the next Senate election.
 

Reports of a rift in the NRC have also started to circulate on
 
 a Line chat group. NRC member Niran Pantharakit openly
 
disagreed with the idea of allowing the charter writers to vote,
 
 prompting responses from CDC chairman Borwornsak Uwanno.
 
Mr Niran claimed that apart from seeing the charter they wrote
 
 put into effect, the CDC had other reasons to want the document
 
 passed. He said the CDC members could continue to sit on
 
the reform body and write organic laws related to the charter
 
 if it passes. They would be paid 6,000 to 9,000 baht for each
 
meeting. There are 247 NRC members and at least 124 votes

 
are needed to pass the charter draft if the CDC votes are included.
 
 Excluding the CDC votes, the vote will likely lean toward a "no".
 
 Many provincial NRC members have made clear that they will
 
 reject it.

 
Together, they amount to 100 votes. The EC also proposed
 
 on Saturday to hold a forum in which both supporters and
 
 critics of the charter draft could air their views independently
 
 and fairly.


Mr Wissanu said this week that anti-charter campaigns by any
 
 group through Line or other chat applications, video clips,
 
forums or text messages would be illegal. He said the move
 
 was tantamount to instigating unrest and violated the junta's
 
 orders against sedition. The comment was heavily criticised
 
 for its stance. Samart Kaewmeechai, a former Chiang Rai MP
 
 of the Pheu Thai Party, said politicians were ready to explain
 
to the people the flaws of the draft so they have information
 
 for their own judgement in the referendum.
 
Mr Wissanu did not say whether talking about the good points
 
 of the charter or promoting it would be banned as well.

 

News,Politics,Bangkok Post, 29 August 2015.

 

In my viewpoint, since there is no law to rule that the NRC
 
 member who are CDC also can not vote so they have the right
 
as NRC member to vote so that proportion number of voters
 
 that can pass the constitution  will be the same,otherwise if we
 
 deduct some member  off the proportion of voters that might
 
 pass the constitution must be change also and that should
 
not happen.

 

For the point that some of NRC members try to reject the
 
 constitution, if they do  they must have clear and reasonable
 
reason to reject ,because this draft constitution had the public
 
 opinion  include already before  the CDC conclude the final
 
draft already.

 
From my opinion ,some of the NRC members have not very good

 
image  for they have conflict of interest by their opinion since the

 
others case that we can hear before .

 

I hope at this time for the progress of the country the NRC

 
members should have spirit to do for the benefit of the
 
country first.

 

Sincerely Yours.


ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น